Back to Blog
![]() “Core Intuitions About Persons Coexist and Interfere With Acquired Christian Beliefs About God”, Cognitive Science 41, no. “Why Did This Happen to Me? Religious Believers’ and Non-Believers’ Teleological Reasoning about Life Events”, Cognition 133, no. Unpublished e-book.īanerjee, Konika, and Paul Bloom. “The Religious Context of Prejudice”, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 5, no. This paper considers empirical reasons to doubt that such a process is taking place.Īllport, Gordon W. Such a response, however, would have to assume that God is restoring the minds of believers. If God hates idolatry and moral evil, why would he give rise to mind with such biases? A Plantingian response would point to the noetic effects of sin. Second, it also makes us prone to tribalism. First, our natural cognition seems to favor false god-beliefs over true ones. This suggestion raises two theological worries. They propose that God may have given rise to the god-faculty via guided evolution. ![]() ![]() Justin Barrett and Kelly James Clark have suggested that cognitive science of religion supports the existence of a god-faculty akin to sensus divinitatis. ![]() Cognitive science of religion, Noetic effects of sin, sensus divinitatis, Reformed epistemology, Prejudice, Evolution of religion Abstract ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |